I find it odd that after 17 years of Wikipedia’s existence, its Mediawiki software is still so very crap in terms of usability, styling and adaptability. Having spent 4 days working on project documentation in Mediawiki in the past 2 weeks, I wonder how all Wikipedians learned to ignore the many hurdles their tool of choice has.
Afaik, there’s vocal opposition to restyling the page itself. The tool, MediaWiki, might be in a similar situation?
Makes me wonder where all the donation money is going…
No need to wonder: You can look that up in the annual financial reports wikimediafoundation.org/about/financia…