I find it odd that after 17 years of Wikipedia’s existence, its Mediawiki software is still so very crap in terms of usability, styling and adaptability. Having spent 4 days working on project documentation in Mediawiki in the past 2 weeks, I wonder how all Wikipedians learned to ignore the many hurdles their tool of choice has.
English
Afaik, there’s vocal opposition to restyling the page itself. The tool, MediaWiki, might be in a similar situation?
Makes me wonder where all the donation money is going…
No need to wonder: You can look that up in the annual financial reports wikimediafoundation.org/about/financia…