I’ve been using Flickr.com to externally share photos since March 2005 (just before the Yahoo acquisition), and I have some 40.000 photos there from the past two decades.
Pixelfed a federated photo sharing tool is meant as a Instagram alternative. I created a test account on Pixelfed.social in December 2018 (profile number 4000) but never used it for anything.

More recently Pixelfed has enjoyed wider attention and has been a top download on mobile phones.

I wonder, would Pixelfed be suitable as a Flickr replacement? Does anyone treat is as such yet?

A quick exploration of the settings seems to indicate I can’t, like in Flickr, share images with specific circles of contacts (e.g. designated family for pictures that have our daughter in it), or choose to not share them at all other than with myself. Uploads are limited to 20 images at a time, I saw, although albums (on Pixelfed connections) are possible. There also doesn’t (yet?) seem to be a way to explore an image exif or other meta-data, like location.

I’m tempted to self-host a personal instance to experiment. Anyone with experience in that?

12 reactions on “Is Pixelfed Suitable as Flickr Replacement?

  1. @ton @pixelfed Ik vond zelf hosten (te)veel gedoe (misschien een jaar of wat terug). Heb er redelijk serieus naar gekeken, maar opgegeven. Los van de technische rimram, kosten voor opslag, ik weet niet of het (voor mij) functioneel Flickr kan vervangen. En ook, het is een kopie van instagram, vergelijkbare interface, en daarmee (alweer voor mij) al minder aantrekkelijk.

  2. I hear great stories about Immich – I’m not sure how well it would work for ‘public’ photo hosting – but for private photo hosting it’s by far the recommended option it seems

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.