Sebastiaan at IWC Nürnberg last weekend did some cool stuff with visualising feeds he follows, as well as find a way of surfacing stuff from outside his feeds because those in his feeds talk about it or like it. That is very exciting to me as it creates a peripheral view, and really puts your network to use as a filter. He follows up with a good posting on readers.

Towards the end of that posting there’s some discussion of how to combat ways of feed overwhelm.
That Sebastiaan, reminds me of what I wrote about my feedreading strategies in 2005 (take a look at the images there, they help in understanding the text that follows).

I think it is useful to think not just of what you yourself consume in terms of feeds, and how to optimise that, but also in terms of the feedback loops you need/want back to the authors of some of your feeds.

Your network is a filter, and a certain level of feedback is needed to be able to spot patterns that lift signals above the noise, the peripheral vision you described. Both individually and collectively. But too much feedback creates echo-chambers. So the overall quality of your network / network’s feeds and interaction is part of the equation in thinking about feed overwhelm. It introduces needs for alternating and deliberate phases of divergence and convergence, and being able to judge diversity and quality of your network.

It’s in that regard very important to realise that there’s a key factor not present in your feeds that is enormously useful for filtering: your own personal knowledge about the author of a feed. If you can tag feeds with what you know of their authors (coder, Berlin, Drupal, e.g.), and how you perceive the social distance between you and them (from significant other to total stranger), you can do even more visualising by asking questions like “what are the topics that European front-end developers I know are excited about this week”, or by visualising what communities are talking about. Social distance also is a factor in dealing with overwhelm: I for instance read a handful of people important to me every day when they have posted, and others I don’t read if I don’t have time, and I therefore group my feeds by social distance.

Finally, overwhelm is more likely if you approach feeds as drinking from a tap. But again, you know things that are not present in your feeds: current interests you have, questions you have, things you’re working on. A listener more likely hears those things better that are close to them. This points to less a river-of-news approach, and more to an active interrogation of feeds based on your personal ‘agenda’ at a time of your choosing.

Fear of missing out is not important, especially not when the feedback loops, that I mentioned above, between authors exist. If it is a signal of some sort, and not noise, it will bounce around your network-as-a-filter for a while, and is likely to be there in some form still, when you next take a look. If it is important and you overlooked it, it will come up again when you look another time.

Also see my posting about my ideal feedreader, from a few months ago.

3 reactions on “Feed Reading Strategies and Tools

  1. Ton, in je post over feedreaders vind ik veel resonantie waar we afgelopen weekend over spraken. We hadden dezelfde reactie bij de demo van Sebastiaan: “wow, dit is cool! Hier kun je boeiende dingen mee doen”

    Een zin in je post bracht me op het volgende:

    a certain level of feedback is needed to be able to spot patterns that lift signals above the noise

    Dit is iets waar alle silo-netwerken je mee bespelen. In hun algoritmes wordt meegenomen hoe jij reageert op specifieke posts van je netwerk. Op basis daarvan krijg je alternatieve posts aangeboden buiten je netwerk (“Frank liked…”, “Peter responded to…”)

    In besloten netwerken is dat het mechanisme wat je binnen het netwerk houdt, de eindeloze klikparade door het doolhof van je netwerk. Zonder ooit de silo te verlaten. In een open web is het juist de kracht van dergelijke algoritmes en verbindingen om anderen te vinden. Ieder op zijn eigen domein met een eigen uitstraling.

    Originele link

  2. Building a digital garden (

    Creative research is all about collecting the dots.

    Dit hele artikel staat vol met links en interessante ideeën om je blog en website meer eigen te maken.
    De link naar Robin Sloan is te mooi. Een van mijn favoriete schrijvers. Toevallig kocht ik gisteren weer een boek van hem.

    Een website kan zoveel meer zijn dan alleen een blog of een etalage. Check zeker de links onder het artikel naar diverse persoonlijke wiki’s. Kleine inkijkjes in het leven van anderen. Ton, ik denk dat je hier veel inspiratie uit haalt voor je Networked Agency thinking!

    Doorgeplaatst op:

Comments are closed.