« Second Life I : The Hype | Main | Learning Drupal »

Second Life II: The Value

Last december I was interviewed for Elseviers weekly, sort of the Dutch version of Time Magazine, regarding Second Life. In the past week the resulting cover story was published, which prompted me to write a miniseries about Second Life on our company blog. The previous, this and the coming posting are translations of those postings.

If we try to look behind the hype, where can we see the signs of real value in Second Life? I would say value resides in immersion, the fact that the entire environment can be built and manipulated at will, the unique forms of expression SL makes possible, the real growth behind the hype, and the development we may expect in the near future. Of course there are also aspects keeping value back, and those with no value at all.

Immersion and full manipulability: 3D is here to stay
Second Life is the first 3D environment that is both not meant as a game as well as drawing in significant numbers of people. That it's not a game means there are no up front goals, rules, and that the environment is not meant to have a certain form. Residents create the landscape themselves, and after creation can keep on altering it. Their own appearance, and each and every object. The internal economy is based on that ability to manipulate everything. This makes SL much more into a platform.

Immersion is a powerfull feature of 3D worlds, where attention and engagement are concerned. Not just for marketing purposes but for regular conversations and group events as well. Whether Second Life itself will survive or not, a fully adaptable 3D environment will become part of our standard media mix that we have at our disposal on the internet.


Heart Murmur simulation for educational purposes

Worthwile forms of use
Most of Second Life seems to be replicated from our regular surroundings, but then in a well kempt and suburban form. The really interesting uses I've encountered however are those that try to build on the unique possibilities a virtual world provides. Only then does SL realize its possibility as a new medium.

Those interesting uses can be categorized roughly along the following lines:

NOAA live weather simulation
Live projection of rain showers on the US east coast

Positive developments in SL
Behind the hype real growth is hidden. The number of people on-line at any given moment has doubled in the past few months. The daily turnover in in-world transactions quadrupled since August. So growth is there. (Have a look at the Second Life statistics)

By opening up the client software it is now possible for third parties to create their own Second Life 'browser'. I expect the availability of much less demanding client software (the current client takes a lot of resources on your system) that will integrate other functionalities at the same time. Obvious candidates for integration are voice applications with API's, and easy publishing options for weblogs and Flickr etc. Another candidate is importing designs from more user friendly graphic design applications as objects into Second Life. At the same time opening up the client means more time and energy for Linden Labs to fix their creaking and groaning server infrastructure.

Where not to expect value (yet)?
Second Life is suffering under the influx of new users. The infrastructure is barely coping, the rendering of graphics is very slow, and the system demands of the client software are way too high. These however are likely to be temporary problems.

Using Second Life to reintroduce spatial constraints we got rid of with the webbrowser is without value and merit. I have seen suggestions that Amazon should open up shop in SL. Bad idea. Amazon's succes builds on the fact that they can over millions of titles, much more than any bookstore could ever hope to have shelf space for. Opening a bookstore in SL reintroduces the problem of limited shelf space in a virtual environment. Hyperlinking (jumping without loss of time from destination, and the ability to browse and quickly flick back and forth) is another browser affordance you do not want to sacrifice while moving into 3D.

Finally the number of people in SL can hardly be construed as mainstream adoption yet. Newly registered users are confronted with a confusing learning path, and the hurdles of quickly integrating into SL society as a resident are big. People dipping in their toes just to see what the fuss is all about are easily deterred, never to return.
This does not bode well for the potential of really tieing in a massive user base. Entering SL is to a large extent still too much of a culture shock.

But at the same time there is plenty of reason to explore as an individual and as a company to see what's up. If you decide to stay away for now, make it a conscious and informed decision at least.

Permalink

may I ask you a simple question Ton: how much time do you spend on Second Life? Or have you come across any statistics about how much time the average user spends on it?

As you might assume by my question I am one of these persons who registered once and never returned. I was just not drawn into it; at least not for the first ten minutes that I was giving it a try. Anyway, I am generally not much attracted by games, but I would like to understand the enthusiasm.

By the way, would be interesting to see the distribution of male and female (I am not talking about the characters in Second Life, but the real persons behind them) users. Have you by chance seen any figures on this?

Posted by: barbara kieslinger at February 2, 2007 3:32 PM

Hi Barbara,
I am not aware of statistics of time spent within SL. It seems Linden Labs is not really transparant in that regard.
My own time in SL is not much. At the start I spent a couple of evenings, figuring out what to do etc. After that I have had weeks where I spent half a day, usually looking for specific things, like examples of education in SL, or going to an event (conference, presentation etc.). In the past few weeks I have been there maybe half an hour or an hour a week, usually to meet up with someone.

I do think that finding your footing in SL takes a relatively large amount of time. Whereas after that stage it just became part of the 'channels' I have at my disposal to connect to the world.

Posted by: Ton Zijlstra at February 4, 2007 4:30 PM

Post a comment










Remember personal info?






About

ton2small.jpg Weblog by Ton Zijlstra,
Enschede, Netherlands
I write about knowledge work and management, and the tools and strategies that help us navigate the networked world.
Contacting me is easy and appreciated:
E-mail, Skype, MSN

Syndication:
Full posts
Excerpts

Interdependent Thoughts in Dutch and German:
RSS Nederlands
RSS Deutsch

Archives


March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002

Miscellaneous

Technorati Profile

Powered by Movable Type and Qumana
i_use_qumana.png

eXTReMe Tracker


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.