TON'S INTERDEPENDENT THOUGHTS |
||
|
My current thoughts repository on the web
Interdependent Thoughts also available in Dutch and German
(Nederlands)
(Deutsch)
Links:
Knowledge Board Blogtalk Conference Ryze Blogalization Blogs I read:
(f) : met face to face
My microblogosphere:
Technorati Cosmos Blogstreet Neighbourhood Blogdex track Organica Daypop Blogtree GeoURL
Search my blogosphere:
Archives
March 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002
|
Actionable (adj.)Marshall comments on my postings on Actionable Sense: Check a dictionary. The word "actionable" refers to something that you can be sued for doing. I recently heard someone in a corporation asking employees for "actionable suggestions". They were trying to ask for suggestions that included things that could be acted upon to bring real improvement, but unfortunately, according to the dictionary, an "actionable suggestion" is actually a suggestion that you can be sued for making. Indeed, the dictionary defines actionable as an adjective meaning "giving sufficient cause for action in a lawsuit". I used the term in the meaning of "can be acted upon", specifically knowledge that can be acted upon. So I make two mistakes here, first in the meaning of the word, and second using it as an adverb in the phrase "making actionable sense". For both mistakes I plead not being a native speaker :) It merely sounded right to my ears when I used it first. And it still does. Because digging a little deeper into the dictionaries, I consistently come across the reference to the Latin "actionabilis". Dusting of my old Latin dictionary and looking up actio, I find that "actio causae" means lawsuit and the phrase "actionem habere" means being able to sue, but only as its fourth and fifth meaning in specific contexts. To me, but I'm no etymologist, it reads as if the general word "actio" in its legal sense "actio causae" has been taken up into the English language leaving out the special context. Much like saying intercourse when in fact sexual intercourse is meant and forgetting that intercourse originally means nothing more than having dealings with others. So in this case I'm not inclined to change back my vocabulary, even while admitting my sin against the current definition of the word. Wouldn't it be a fine thing when the corporate world upon hearing the word actionable would not be looking for their sollicitors phonenumber, but would feel their entrepeneurial spirit was called upon, would feel a call for action? Why not take this as a first step in shaping a new vocabulary, and one away from a corporate world stifled by the fear of litigation that looms like the sword of Damocles over their heads. And if we keep using it, eventually it'll end up in the dictionary. Does anyone know how many occurences are needed for a word to become a new addition to the dictionary? Permalink | TrackBack | WaypathComments
The same person made the same comment on my related posts - I agreed with him that what he said matched the dictionary, and suggested he help us find a word that matched our intent - that was the last I heard! Posted by: Julian at January 6, 2004 11:01 PM"Exploitable" means "employable to one's advantage." Close enough? Please, leave "actionable" alone or we lawyers will have to take ... Posted by: Michael at January 18, 2004 2:01 AMMichael, I don't like the negative connotations that come with the word exploitable. But thanks for the suggestion! Post a comment
|
Powered by
|